Anonymous Peer reviewers' Openness Initiative request

+ Rationale

+ How it works

Prior to accepting a request to review, the reviewer specifies what they would like the author to agree to in terms of openness. The authors are then able to accept, decline or suggest modifications to the agreement. Once the author and invited reviewer are agreed, the reviewer accepts the assignment from the journal. A record of the review agreement is kept for future reference.

Paper title:*
Authors
Author email:*
Before accepting the review invitation, the reviewer would like to ask the authors if they are willing to agree to the following: (Set a field to blank if don't wish to specify.)
All data needed for evaluation and reproduction of the published research should be made publicly available, online, hosted by a reliable third party, and the links provided in the manuscript. If some data cannot be made available the reasons should be explained in the manuscript.
Stimulus materials, experimental instructions and programs, survey questions, and other similar materials should be made publicly available, hosted by a reliable third party and the link provided in the manuscript. If some material cannot be made available in this way, explain why unable to do so in the text of manuscript
Documents containing details for interpreting any files or code, and how to compile and run any software programs should be made available with the above items. In addition, licensing or other restrictions on their use should be made clear.
Comments
The reviewer is also willing to commit to: (Set a field to blank if don't wish to specify.)
Complete review within following period:
Agree to reviewing a revised manuscript, if required
Comments